Hildegard and the Vitruvian Man

While listening to DaVinci’s Ghost, an audio book on Leonardo Da Vinci and his Vitruvian Man (You know, his drawing of the naked man in the circle and square doing jumping jacks), I was surprised to hear an extensive discussion of Hildegard of Bingen and her own Vitruvian Man.  As background, Vitruvius was a scholar and contemporary of Caesar Augustus.  He wrote a 10 volume work on architecture which included a celebration of man (not woman) as a microcosm of the macrocosm of the universe.  Man, in his perfection, was a little universe that reflected the entire of creation.  Perfection would require man to have perfect proportions, all done mathematically.  You can see Leonardo’s Vitruvian man as a model of proportional perfection.  Hildegard took this in a more spiritual direction.  Needless to say, she didn’t restrict “man” to the male portion of humanity, but to all peoples.

More background on Hildegard, whom I discussed in my book, Sisters in Song:  This remarkable woman, born in 1098 in the Rhine Valley, was tithed by her parents to the church.  She became a nun, and in the process, became quite educated by the standards of the day, or perhaps any day. She corresponded with Bernard of Clairvaux, Popes Anastasius IV and Adrian IV, the Holy Roman emperor Frederick Barbarossa, and the German king Conrad III.  In the Middle Ages, it was believed the holiness of others could overcome one’s own shortcomings merely by association.   Thus, there was extensive correspondence from those same people to her.  She traveled to various monastic communities and gave sermons in which she reprimanded lax clergy.  Few women could claim such privilege.  She wrote on natural science, medicine, theology, and music, among other things.   She is the first identifiable person to have written both words and music to sacred song.  Seventy-five of her songs are extant.  Her analogies and metaphors were quite deft.  As an example, her rich imagery included jewels as crystallizations of liquids in her hymn  “O ignee Spiritus, laus tibi sit” (“O fiery Spirit, praise be to you”)  Christ’s wounds were identified with jewels and the image includes the transformation of humankind’s wounds, or sins, into jewels, or virtues.   Song was important to her.  When her convent was placed under interdict for refusing to exhume the body of an excommunicated nobleman from their cemetery, they were barred from any music.  She wrote the prelates that music and song have a high place in divine worship and in the divine plan.  Those who silence any in praise of God are wrong.  She wrote they “Must use the greatest vigilance before stopping by decree, the mouth of any assembly of people singing to God.  You must beware lest you are ensnared by Satan, who drew man out of the celestial harmony and the delights of paradise”.  The interdict was lifted.

Back to Vitruvian Man.  She experienced visions that the church accepted as messages from God.  In many visions, she saw the figure of a human being, arms outstretched, within a circle which was within a square.  “Humanity stands in the midst of the structure of the world.  . . . humanity is powerful in the power of its soul.  Its head is turned upward and its feet to the solid ground, and it can place into motion both the higher and lower things.”  For Hildegard, a living cosmology included the element of art, both visual and aural.  We can hear this in her antiphon, “O quam mirabilis” (“For the Creator”) which says, “When God looked on the face of the man whom He formed, He saw all his works whole in that same human form.”  To her, singing the words revealed their meanings directly to the soul.  And singing could be done only through a physical life.

 

2 thoughts on “Hildegard and the Vitruvian Man

  1. So you think this common shared image-symbol, discovered by separate beings who did not know one another is a testimony to the sacred collective consciousness in which we all swim?

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    • leslieclay1 says:

      Vitruvius, Hildegard, Leonardo. And they weren’t the only ones. Your observation could very well be correct. Or it may just be the collective vanity of humans to think they are the center and culmination of all creation. Is that a sacred collective consciousness?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s